Will the repentance of a witch (practitioner of witchcraft) be accepted by Allaah? Because I heard that a witch asked the Sahaabah about repenting after the death of the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and no one answered her. What did they say to her? Would her faith benefit her before Allaah? Why do the scholars issue fatwas about the acceptance of the witch’s repentance in this case?.
Praise be to Allaah.
Learning witchcraft and practising it constitute kufr. Allaah
says (interpretation of the meaning):
“They followed what the
Shayaateen (devils) gave out (falsely of the magic) in the lifetime of
Sulaymaan (Solomon). Sulaymaan did not disbelieve, but the Shayaateen
(devils) disbelieved, teaching men magic and such things that came down at
Babylon to the two angels, Haaroot and Maaroot, but neither of these two
(angels) taught anyone (such things) till they had said, ‘We are for trial,
so disbelieve not (by learning this magic from us).’”
A practitioner of witchcraft may do something that makes him
an apostate, so he commits kufr and should be executed for his apostasy. Or
he may practise witchcraft by doing something that does not constitute kufr.
In that case there is a difference of scholarly opinion, but the correct
view is that he should also be executed if it is proven that he is a
practitioner of witchcraft. This is what the Sahaabah (may Allaah be pleased
with them) did and enjoined other to do. If he is executed, he should not be
washed or shrouded or buried in the Muslim graveyard.
There should be no hesitation in executing the practitioner
of witchcraft, whether we say that he is a kaafir or not, because this is
what is proven from the companions of the Prophet (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him). Executing him prevents the spread of evil and serves
as a deterrent to his fellow practitioners of witchcraft.
If a practitioner of witchcraft repents sincerely to Allaah,
then Allaah will accept his repentance. This is between him and his Lord,
before the matter reaches the courts. But if the matter reaches the Islamic
court, then the qaadi should execute him without asking him to repent, so as
to rid society of his evil. But it is not permissible for any individual to
carry out the hadd punishment by himself, rather the matter must be referred
to the authorities.
There follow some fatwas of the scholars on this matter:
1 – Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy on
If a practitioner of witchcraft repents sincerely to Allaah,
that will benefit him before Allaah, for Allaah accepts repentance from the
mushrikeen and others, as He says (interpretation of the meaning):
He it is Who accepts repentance from His slaves, and forgives sins”
“And all of you beg Allaah to forgive you all, O
believers, that you may be successful”
But in this world it is
not accepted. The correct view is that he is to be executed. If it is proven
to the court that he is a practitioner of witchcraft, then he should be
executed, even if he says, “I have repented.” His repentance between him and
Allaah is valid, if he is sincere, and that will benefit him before Allaah,
but according to the Islamic ruling he is to be executed, just as ‘Umar
executed the practitioners of witchcraft, because their evil is great. They
may say, “We have repented,” but they may be lying, and the people will be
harmed and may not be safe from their evil because of the repentance that
they show. So they should be executed, and their repentance will benefit
them before Allaah if they are sincere. End quote.
Majmoo’ Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Baaz,
2 – The Shaykh (may Allaah have mercy on him) also said:
The correct view according to the scholars is that the
practitioner of witchcraft should be executed without being asked to repent,
because of the seriousness of their evil. Some scholars are of the view that
they should be asked to repent, and that they are like any other kaafirs who
should be asked to repent. But the correct scholarly view is that they
should not be asked to repent because their evil is so great, and because
they conceal their evil and their kufr; they may claim to have repented but
they are lying, and may cause a great deal of harm to people as a result.
Hence the scholars were of the view that the one who is known and proven to
be a practitioner of witchcraft should be executed even if he claims that he
has repented and that he regrets what he has done; he should not be
Hence it is narrated that ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with
him) wrote to the commanders of the troops telling them to execute every
practitioner of witchcraft they found, so as to guard against their evil.
Abu ‘Uthmaan al-Nahdi said: “We executed three practitioners of witchcraft.”
This is how it was narrated in Saheeh al-Bukhaari from Bajaalah ibn ‘Abdah.
[It was also narrated by Abu Dawood with a saheeh isnaad, and the original
report is in al-Bukhaari].
And it is narrated in a saheeh report that Hafsah executed a
slave woman of hers because she found out that she was engaging in
witchcraft. And when the great Sahaabi Jundub ibn ‘Abd-Allaah (may Allaah be
pleased with him) saw a practitioner of witchcraft playing with his head –
making the people think that he was cutting off his head and putting it back
– he approached him without him realizing and killed him, and said: “Now put
your head back if you are telling the truth!”
Conclusion: the evil of the practitioners of witchcraft is
great, hence it is obligatory to execute them. If the authorities know that
they are practitioners of witchcraft, and that is proven with shar’i
evidence, then they have to execute them, so as to protect society from
their evil and corruption. End quote.
3 –The Shaykh also said (8/111):
If he is executed, the funeral prayer should not be offered
for him, and he should not be buried in the graveyard of the Muslims; he
should be buried in the graveyard of the kaafirs. He should not be buried in
the graveyard of the Muslims, the funeral prayer should not be offered for
him, and he should not be washed or shrouded. We ask Allaah to keep us safe
4 – He also said:
The ruling on the practitioner of witchcraft who is known to
make people imagine things, or whose actions result in harm for people, such
as causing people to see things that are not there, making a man beloved to
his wife or a wife beloved to her husband, or the opposite, which causes
harm to people, if that is proven by means of evidence in the Islamic court,
then this practitioner of witchcraft must be executed and his repentance
should not be accepted even if he repents.
We have quoted above the report narrated from ‘Umar (may
Allaah be pleased with him), who ordered his commanders to kill the
practitioners of witxhcraft so as to prevent their mischief on earth and to
stop them disturbing the Muslims and causing harm to people. As soon as they
are found out, then it is obligatory for the Muslim leaders to execute them
even if they say “We have repented”, because there is no guarantee. If they
are sincere in their repentance, that will benefit them before Allaah,
because of the general meaning of the verse in which Allaah says
(interpretation of the meaning):
“And He it is Who accepts
repentance from His slaves, and forgives sins, and He knows what you do”
If a person comes
to the authorities without having been found out and tells them that he has
repented, and that in the past he used to do such and such, but he has
repented to Allaah and he seems outwardly to be good, then his repentance
should be accepted, because he has come voluntarily, seeking goodness and
announcing his repentance without having been found out and without anyone
making any claims against him. So if he comes in a manner that does not
suggest any kind of trickery, then his repentance should be accepted,
because he has come repenting and expressing regret, like any other kaafir
who may have a bad past, then Allaah blesses him by enabling him to repent
without being forced do that by anyone and without anyone making any claims
against him. End quote.
Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Baaz (8/81, 82)
5 – The scholars
of the Standing Committee said:
practitioner of witchcraft does any act of kufr in his magic, then he is to
be executed as a hadd punishment for his kufr. If it is proven that he
killed by means of his magic someone whose life is protected by sharee’ah,
then he should be executed as a qasaas punishment. If he did not do any act
of kufr or kill anyone by means of his magic, then there is a difference of
scholarly opinion with regard to executing him for his witchcraft. But the
correct view is that he should be executed as a hadd punishment for his
apostasy. This is the view of Abu Haneefah, Maalik and Ahmad (may Allaah
have mercy on them), because his magic ipso facto means that he is a kaafir,
because the verse (interpretation of the meaning):
“They followed what the Shayaateen (devils) gave out
(falsely of the magic) in the lifetime of Sulaymaan (Solomon). Sulaymaan did
not disbelieve, but the Shayaateen (devils) disbelieved, teaching men magic
indicates that all
practitioners of witchcraft are kaafirs. And it is proven in
that Bajaalah ibn ‘Abdah said: ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab (may Allaah be pleased
with him) wrote saying: Execute every practitioner of witchcraft, male or
female, and we executed three practitioners of witchcraft. And it was
narrated that Hafsah, the Mother of the Believers (may Allaah be pleased
with her) ordered that a slave girl of hers who had put a spell on her be
executed, and she was executed. Narrated by Maalik in al-Muwatta’.
And it is proven that Jundub said: The punishment for the practitioner of
witchcraft is a
blow with the sword. Narrated by al-Tirmidhi
who said: the correct view is that it is mawqoof.
Based on this, the ruling on the practitioner of witchcraft asked about in
the question is that he should be executed according to the correct
scholarly view. The one whose job it is to confirm that witchcraft has taken
place and to carry out the punishment is the ruler who is charge of the
Muslims’ affairs, so as to ward off mischief and close the door to chaos.
Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah,
– Shaykh Ibn
Is this execution a hadd punishment or killing him because of his kufr?
Both are possible, based on the details about the kufr of the practitioner
of witchcraft that we have discussed above. But based on the above
discussion we say: if a person’s witchcraft constitutes kufr, then his
execution is that of an apostate, but if his witchcraft does not constitute
kufr, then it comes under the heading of protection against serious harm,
and it must be implemented as the ruler sees fit.
Practitioners of witchcraft must be executed, whether or not we say that it
is because of their kufr, because they make people sick and may even kill
them, they cause separation between husband and wife, and vice versa, and
they may bring about reconciliation between enemies and thus attain their
goals. One of them may bewitch a person to make him like him and get what he
wants from him, such as if one of them bewitches a woman in order to have
his way with her, and because they spread mischief on earth. So it is
obligatory for the authorities to execute them without asking them to
repent, so long as that is done to ward off their harm and the great damage
they may cause. The hadd punishment has nothing to do with being asked to
repent; when the offender is caught the hadd punishment must be carried out.
Majmoo’ Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen, 9/508, 509. This is a
commentary on Kitaab al-Tawheed.
– Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen also said:
The view that (practitioners of witchcraft) should be executed is in
accordance with the principles of sharee’ah, because they spread mischief on
earth and their mischief is one of the greatest forms of mischief. So
executing them is obligatory for the ruler, and it is not permissible for
the ruler to fail to execute them, because if such people are left alone and
their actions become widespread, they will cause mischief in their own land
and in the land of others. But if they are executed the people will be safe
from their evil and the people will be deterred from indulging in
witchcraft. End quote.
Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthyameen (9/509). This is a commentary on
And Allaah knows best.